anti tgn46 polyclonal antibody (Bio-Rad)
Structured Review
Anti Tgn46 Polyclonal Antibody, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 755 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/sheep+polyclonal+anti+human+tgn46/Sheep+anti+Human+TGN46/pmc13023029-102-23-28
Average 96 stars, based on 755 article reviews
Images
Related Articles
other:Article Title: Ribonucleotide reductase subunit M2 mediates the mTOR pathway to recruit furin endoprotease and promote maturation of dengue virus Article Snippet: Sheep polyclonal anti-Human TGN46 , Western Blot:Article Title: Myosin 1b and F-actin are involved in the control of secretory granule biogenesis Article Snippet: .. Primary antibodies used were monoclonal anti-synaptobrevin 2 (104211 from Synaptic system; 1:5,000); monoclonal α-tubulin (T5168 from Sigma; 1:5,000); rabbit polyclonal anti-CgA (EL-35) (1:500 for IF, 1:1,000 for Western blotting); goat polyclonal anti-CgA (sc-23556 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology inc; 1: 200); rabbit polyclonal anti-Myo1b (HPA 013607 from Sigma prestige antibodies; 1:200 for IF, 1:250 for Western blotting); mouse monoclonal anti-GM130 (610822 from BDBiosciences; 1:1,000); rabbit polyclonal anti-furin (Ab3467 from Abcam; 1:200); Article Title: Myosin 1b and F-actin are involved in the control of secretory granule biogenesis. Article Snippet: .. Primary antibodies used were monoclonal anti-synaptobrevin 2 (104211 from Synaptic system; 1:5,000); monoclonal α-tubulin (T5168 from Sigma; 1:5,000); rabbit polyclonal anti-CgA (EL-35)23 (1:500 for IF, 1:1,000 for Western blotting); goat polyclonal anti-CgA (sc-23556 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology inc; 1: 200); rabbit polyclonal anti-Myo1b (HPA 013607 from Sigma prestige antibodies; 1:200 for IF, 1:250 for Western blotting); mouse monoclonal anti-GM130 (610822 from BDBiosciences; 1:1,000); rabbit polyclonal anti-furin (Ab3467 from Abcam; 1:200); |
![( A ) The individual traces of the iFRAP data presented in Fig. are shown. ( B ) Representative traces from A were normalized in two different ways. As presented in ( A ) or they were normalized by total fluorescence to account for bleaching (orange). The curves were qualitatively similar with flat phase followed by an exponential decrease. ( C ) The intensity levels of background (BG; area with no cells), ER and Golgi were measured before and after bleaching in the iFRAP protocol. The bleaching was efficient in the ER while there was little to no change in the Golgi fluorescence (mean ± SD; n > 3). ( D ) VSVG-GFP-RUSH construct localization with Golgi markers (GM130 and <t>TGN46)</t> from the replicate 2 of Fig. . The positions of VSVG-GFP-RUSH and Golgi marker peaks were normalized, setting GM130 as 0 and <t>TGN46</t> as 1. Measurements obtained using line scan analysis (red) are compared with those from the GLIM based automated method (blue) within the same experiment. Each data point represents an individual measurement, with results from both methods shown side-by-side for direct comparison. The relative position of the VSVG-GFP-RUSH construct is plotted at each indicated time point (median ± SE; n is indicated in the figure, n.s = not significant; [Student’s t test]). .](https://pub-med-central-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_central_ids_ending_with_8209/pmc12508209/pmc12508209__44319_2025_548_Fig8_ESM.jpg)
